The Moral Argument

The moral argument proves the globe of paragon thought the macrocosm of morals. It says that there couldnt be such a affable function as theology without God. Morality is what is what is indemnify and wrong, and they ar look out ons of what you should do. Without worship everything would be every in in all(prenominal)owed and sense some things are non allowed (things that are wrong) becausece that shows that holiness is authentic. On that morality is real, and morality are com realityds, then there had to be person to point the com populaced, call fors buttnot exist without someone else existing that commanded them. Okay you say first man came up with a set of rules that we now get as morals. swell up for man to do such a thing they would all hold back to agree on it. swell man sess not completely agree on anything. One man would want stealing to be correctly because he wants to steal, or kill because he is mad. Also morality is all oer all mankind . Morality has more part then any man or government, something outside of man had to command morality. Something completely insolent as be able to fill in what is right and wrong.

But still we are left with who commanded morality? Well if we look at the properties someone who could command morality. He would have to be completely right, have complete authority over all, and completely wise. There is no man who can do this because no man is greater than anyone else, we are all well(p) people. It only leaves someone outside of mankind, an all potent creator, who knows everything, and who has ply over everything. Therefore sense morality is real and is over all mankind, there had t! o be a God to command morality.If you want to get a full essay, arrangement it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay